« New York Times Style | Main | The Graphical Octants »

More on the Planets

One problem with depicting the solar system in an information graphic is that the enormous sizes and distances are hard to grasp. The usual solution is to use logarithms to compress things, but these can be hard to decipher, and sometimes it’s just better to show things to scale. Here’s an elegantly minimalist graph that shows the planetary diameters and distances (using two scales, though—otherwise you’d need a somewhat wider monitor), created by someone identified only as “Brian0918”.

albedobrian.gif

Practically every pixel is data, and even the x axis could be grayed out or dropped entirely, giving an unsurpassable data/ink ratio (which would also help Pluto show up).

The problem element here is the sun, which is so gigantic it swamps everything else. If we were to eliminate it, or just show a chunk, the graphic would become much more concise. I’ve done this below; note the two scales, implicit in the original but I think necessary here—one is five thousand times the size of the other.
 

diamsemimajor.gif
 

That version’s OK for print, but for the web one needs slightly more contrast and more solid typefaces.
 

diamsemimajor2.gif

The other solution for dealing with scale is breaking the graphic into chunks and recalibrating the scale by a sensible amount in each. These comparisons do this (note the common reference object in each successive picture), and use lovely 3D depictions as well, letting us go beyond the solar system to compare our sun with other stars.

planetmodels.jpg

References: Wikipedia has Brian0918’s chart: if anyone has more information on its origins, please leave a comment. The models were found via BoingBoing at Rense.com, which goes to show there are jewels in dross on the Web, but I don’t know the site they were taken from originally. And a practical activity that communicates the scale of the solar system to kids is the Earth is a Peppercorn.

Comments

Hi, I'm the one who created that diagram. I just took the diameters and orbit radii, normalized them (Pluto's radius is one vertical pixel, Mercury's orbit is one horizontal pixel, I believe), and then plotted it out. If you have any questions, please email me at my username through gmail.com

I think that putting the vertical scale inside your representation of the sun harms the data. While the horizontal scale is immediately obvious, my mind had associated the vertical scale as having something to do with the sun, although obviously no data can be read about the sun from the graph (out of interest, is the sun of the correct curvature?). Moving the scale to the left out of the sun might help, but I'm sure there must be a more elegant solution.

I discovered the blog recently and am enjoying and learning immensely. Cheers!

Comments Welcomed

Verification (needed to reduce all the spam I get):